Truth, justice and human life


Pilots recover control

HIMS has grown in its scope and up to the intended original purpose is to create a tight monitoring and monitoring path for pilots, with issues involved in alcohol, to return to work 24 months before the required abstinence as stipulated in the law. The Supreme Court recently ruled over Chevron, which opens the door for the argument that the FAA application for HIMS has exceeded its legal mandate.

What you are about to read is the abomination of the HIMS program. The story of a captain came out of its path by the system that is supposed to support and help. He is fighting. If you are in HIMS, you can help.

My name is Martin Barnard, I am a airline pilot, a living person breathing with a loving family that relies on me, and I was in the Hims program, under the auspices of the study of the motivation behind human intervention (HIMS) medical examinations of amery.

I do not drink and did not last in four years.

I have a flawless and uncomplicated random test, in line with the FAA standards, to document this.

On one occasion in September 2022, I believed with the lack of belief that I might have it unintentionally and without knowing something with alcohol in it, instead of a non -alcohol (0.0) drink as intended. I revealed this to my Amee.

I had a highly sensitive blood test about three days after the event, which was produced by another negative result, which increases the confirmation of abstinence of sex. However, on October 14, 2022, this Amee wrote to FAA that I was in a growing danger for a complete relapse, “which was fill in quickly.

In support of his report on October 14 to the Federal Aviation Administration, Hoz Amy stated that his discovery was based on three considerations:

(1) I have three “reduced” samples in the previous year,

(2) That the result of the October 3 test, 2022 PETH was the “sub -threshold”, and

(3) The motivation for buying beer -like drinks, “whether it contains alcohol or not” “suggests an incomplete freshness.”

I decided to file a lawsuit against this Amee for what I consider to be neglected, including, partly:

Hims Amee reported the three test results as “relief”, despite the fact that the laboratory has reported the result of each sample as “negative”, which confirms that the tests confirmed the absence of alcohol in my regime.

To the extent that HIMS Amee had any concern that the three “diluted” samples reflected the tampering with the donor, he should have moved forward in the direct observation groups that had made it clear to me any alleged misconduct.

Creatinine levels of the “three reduced” test results did not indicate anything that goes beyond the appropriate moisture practices and that I refrained from consuming alcohol. HIMS Amee should have been to FAA that the result of the PETH test on October 3 was “negative”.

Hims Amee should have communicated with FAA that the result of PETH on October 3 provides strong evidence to prove that I have maintained my commitment to complete the refrain from alcohol consumption. However, the paragraph in which Hims Amee refers to PETH as follows: If we look back in the random test of the pilot, he had three reduced samples this year.

The indication of the outcome of the PETH test on October 3, it seems that the “sub -threshold” was understood by FAA as evidence that I was eating alcohol despite the fact that the test was negative.

The third and last basis for the diagnosis of the relapse that Hems Amy communicated to the Angolan armed forces was that “whether or not the consumption of alcohol is, it is an early education in the official recovery” looks “both” drinks, which contain alcohol or not, a confrontation for those in the recovery program. “

HIMS Amee did not advise me that I should refrain from “similar” non -alcoholic drinks or that the consumption of such drinks could lead to relapse. Note: I did not do anything on anything that agreed on this standard.

Download the full details of this case here

I was immediately asked, according to the end of the end, without the ability to make the life arrangements in: The Atlanta Metro Hospital for Restore (MARR) Mental Hospital for Internal Patients for 98 days. Pilot colleagues described the program as closer to prison. After that, I was required to sign the “contract B”, which allows the termination without any cause of alcohol -related accident, or would be completed immediately.

Looking at these unjustified demands, I took a vacation from my airline, according to the employment of unified services and recruitment, the 1994 law law (Userra) to continue my 30 -year military career. I am completely ready and spread all over the world in a flight; I am current and qualified in my main weapons system and I will continue to serve my country until I retire with honor. Neiti retirement from the US Army, according to the Userra Law, will be a return to my airline as a full -time line.

Despite the Userra law, my airline indicated that it intends to end me upon my return from military service. This has been transferred to me several times verbally, and I have received written documents for this intention on September 18, 2023. Based on Amee’s actions, I file a lawsuit against it.

My general goal of this lawsuit is two parts:

1) To bring legal procedures to the HIMS program. There is currently no mechanism available for legal procedures or checks and balances of any kind in HIMS today in the event of any dispute of any kind between different entities. This lack of legal procedures, which allows him to unleadable bureaucrats, is not perceived in the Federal Aviation Administration to act with absolute escape in all situations, making the pilot completely weak and without asylum.

2) My second goal is to define a precedent that Hims Amee can bear the responsibility for neglect that causes harm to the lives of patients/pilots who agreed to the “shepherds”.

I ask to respect help from everything prepared, in any way you can help achieve these goals. Please download the written certificate below and share it with the largest possible number of people. Those who come after us will often appreciate you. Thank you for your time and look!

Email to: Marty.barnard@yahoo.com

I am proud of Captain Bernard’s effort to make a difference and help everyone in this program. Amis should not have immunity to their actions. Each doctor must be responsible. The fact that any doctor can distort the truth of the evidence based on the truth in a way that is negligent, and in my opinion, it should be from a source of concern for everyone. If you are not aware of HIMS and want to know more, please read previous posts:

Thank you

To help you!

Dr. Carlin Pitt

PhD. Master of Business Administration. MHS.
A350, B777, A330, B747-400, B747-200, B767, B757, B737, B727



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *