Airlines adopt Fuel aircraft To ensure that they can protect the end result. Fuel efficiency in aircraft is very important to ensure that the plane gets enough.energy“To move from A to B. What are the other factors he plays?
Aircraft fuel efficiency and progress in air dynamics
The enhancement of the efficiency of the total fuel consumption of the plane is considering several factors. At the same time, this article will not be comprehensive; We will consider some of the main factors that contribute to ensuring a plane efficiently. the Airbus A320
and Boeing 737
It is a very different but similar plane in itself.
Airbus A320neo (Known as the new engine option) was presented by the European plan maker to reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency in general. New engines are fixed with advanced air dynamics and spread throughout the A320 family family, including A319neo and A321neo. These different sizes of aircraft guarantee that they can meet the needs and requirements of different airlines.
On the other hand, Boeing 737 Max
The developed by the American plane maker, Boeing’s answer to compete directly with the famous A320. 737 includes many variables, including:
- 737 Max 7
- 737 Max 8
- 737 Max 9
- 737 Max 10
The MAX series depends on the legacy and success of its predecessor, Classic 737, with promotions focused on engines, aerobic dynamics and other performance features. The series contains a set of initiatives that have improved operational success.
Comparing the two planes alongside
With data from Air partiesAirbus A320 and Boeing 737 can compare:
comparative |
Boeing 737 Max |
Airbus A320neo |
---|---|---|
Engines |
CFM Leap-1B |
CFM LEAP-1A or Pratt & Whitney PW1100g |
efficiency |
14-15 % improve compared to 737 ng |
15-20 % is better than A320ceo |
capacity |
138 – 230 passengers |
140 – 244 passengers |
Noise levels |
Higher than A320neo |
Quietly quieter than 737 |
It ranges |
3550 nautical miles (a maximum of 8) |
3400 nautical miles (A320neo) |
Show the cabin |
11 feet, seven inches |
12 feet, one inch |
Popular markets |
North America, Asia |
Europe, Asia |
Prominent operators |
Ryanire, southwest, US Airlines |
Indigo, Easyjet, Wizzair |
Airbus provided a profile improvement (DPO) during its development. Improving this program can improve and reduce excessive fuel consumption. He does this using FMS (aviation management system) to calculate approaches, which leads to a smoother decrease and reduce heavy braking. With this improvement, it allows about 75 kg to save fuel for every decent.

Related
Innovations made in space to improve fuel efficiency
Aircraft makers have made other developments to improve the operational efficiency of the aircraft. These include:
-
RNP Ar (Mobility Performance License required) Wanted)
-
This allows the aircraft directly and efficiently on the expected flight tracks.
-
It reduces both the use of fuel and the duration of the journey in general
-
-
-
Air Management Job (AMF)
-
This unique system adjusts the amount of fresh air and recycled air in the cabin of the aircraft.
-
This can lead to annual fuel savings of about 115 tons per aircraft
-
Low fuel consumption and emissions in Boeing 737 as a maximum
Boeing and Airbus’s 737 MAX and A320neo are the most efficient fuel consumption currently. This is thanks to the developments in engine technologies, which include the next generation engines specifically designed to reduce emissions, reduce fuel consumption, and expand the range and performance of the plane.
The Boeing 737 Max Leap 1B engine greatly contributes to improving fuel efficiency, which witnessed 14 % less fuel consumption compared to previous aircraft. The hidden high -hidden turbocharged engine can reduce fuel and fly with improved payment.
Photo: CFM International
Advanced materials include the components of aluminum, which reduced the weight of the total engine and enhance its age and durability – which leads to high pressure rates in the basic engine to improve thermal efficiency and low fuel burning.
Through these improvements on a Boeing plane, it can cover a maximum of 737, equipped with a division division wing, longer distances with fewer fuel, making it the most cost -effective option in the Boeing fleet for cost -cost conscious airlines. The success of this plane by US Airlines, Ryanaire
Those who multiply these aircraft as the backbone of the short and medium -sized aircraft operations.

Related
Look at Airbus A320neo engines, LEAP-1A or PW1100 engines
For Airbus, European aircraft maker, A320neo revolutionized how we travel to short and medium travel. The A320neo contains Leap-1A or PRTTTTE & Whitney PW1100G engines. Two engine options allow between 15 to 20 % of fuel saving compared to the former A320CEO models.
CFM Leap-1A engines use a similar technology for LEAP-1B; However, it has been specifically improved and coordinated for the A320neo plane. This includes CMC materials and light weight that strengthened Airbus’s overall efficiency. Compared to Pratt & Whitney PW1100G Turbofan, this design allows low pressure turbines to work at different speeds, which increases total efficiency.
A320 is known as one of the most calm planes of its kind. It is ranked about 75 % quieter than old aircraft with other engine models. A320neo development can provide 20 % better burning, depending on road conditions and operational requirements.
Associated with low maintenance costs and low engine erosion, A320neo is one of the most efficient fuel -efficient aircraft. If you want to compare the A320neo (with PW1100G engines), it is more efficiently more than 737 as a maximum on medium -range flights. However, on the other side of the spectrum, 737 Max can advance in relation to the group and the load.

Related
A320neo, or a maximum of 737, is cheaper for work
Both planes are incredibly competitive. While Airbus A320neo often low operating cost reports with their PW1100g engines, the electric -powered versions of both aircraft are face to face. Both aircraft can provide a large fuel savings compared to the previous generation aircraft. 737 excels in aerodynamics, and the A320 wins when it comes to the efficiency of the engine design. However, it ultimately depends on the operating requirements of the airline, the common fleet targets, and the sustainability goals.
Photo: Jack Darling Photo Shutterstock
The economy can be measured in the fuel consumption of aircraft in several ways, whether through improved aerodynamics, weight reduction according to alternative materials, or the density of sitting on the plane. Poisoning this with goods and loading factors, all playing in the account.
The average fuel burning of the new aircraft decreased about 45 % between the sixties and the past decade. Depending on the requirements of airlines and the roads that serve them, they all have different operating costs. The most effective way to airlines are short flights, as more fuel is required to take off and land. That is why you will see frequent old aircraft that operate short -term flights.

Related
The fuel burning account is still difficult
CereiumThe online aviation analysis company, that the fuel burning account is still an accurate challenge due to various operating factors. Yuanfei Zhao, chief flight analyst at Cirium Ascendancey, explains:
“The accurate burning of aircraft fuel is a challenge because burning fuel can be affected by various operating factors such as mass distance, taxi time, seating layouts, and operating environment.
The “new generation plane” is usually more than 15-20 % of fuel efficiency from its predecessors, “meaning Max VS NG and Neo VS. The efficiency of rhetorical fuel consumption 15-20 % is theory and can only be achieved under specific circumstances.”
Sitting layout, loading factors, and beneficial load in the account when it comes to operational efficiency. The most common way to compare the older generation and new generation aircraft is to compare its costs in similar flights.
Other improved operations reduce aircraft emissions, including one -engine taxis and continuous traumatic curricula. Changes in operational procedures, when combining, can provide up to 77 lbs of fuel per reduction for ten minutes. Maintenance can also be on fuel, with a regular engine washing schedule.
The bottom line
When comparing the efficiency of Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 Max, both planes can be compared to large improvements compared to their ancestors. While it is forbidden for Airbus A320 edges forward in terms of fuel savings, 737 Max has better air dynamics and advanced engines technology.
For short -term roads, it is known that Airbus A320neo is the most efficient in fuel consumption, especially when installing the PW1100G engine. However, if the journey continues further, Boeing 737 Max excels in long -term processes.
Photo: VDB photos | Shutterstock
The world’s largest operators in the world include A320neo Indigo, Wizz Air, American Airlines, Lufthansa and Air Asia
. In contrast, the largest Boeing 737 MAX aircraft operator includes Southwest, Ryanair, American Airlines, and UNICED AIRINES, and flydubai
.
As you can see, both planes are preferred by fully services and low -cost transport companies, indicating its operational flexibility at both ends of the travel spectrum.